
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — A Minnesota jury awarded $65.5 million on Friday to a mother of three who claimed talcum products made by Johnson & Johnson exposed her to asbestos and contributed to her developing cancer in the lining of her lungs.
Jurors determined that plaintiff Anna Jean Houghton Carley, 37, should be compensated by Johnson & Johnson after using its baby powder throughout her childhood and later developing mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer caused primarily by exposure to the carcinogen asbestos.
Johnson & Johnson said it would appeal the verdict.
During a 13-day trial in Ramsey County District Court, Carley's legal team argued the pharmaceutical giant sold and marketed talc-based products to consumers despite knowing it can be contaminated with asbestos. Carley's lawyers also said her family was never warned about potential dangers while using the product on their child. The product was taken off shelves in the U.S. in 2020.
“This case was not about compensation only. It was about truth and accountability," Carley's attorney Ben Braly said.
Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation for Johnson & Johnson, argued the company's baby powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer. He expects an appellate court to reverse the decision.
The verdict is the latest development in a longstanding legal battle over claims that talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body powder was connected to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, which strikes the lungs and other organs. Johnson & Johnson stopped selling powder made with talc worldwide in 2023.
“These lawsuits are predicated on ‘junk science,’ refuted by decades of studies that demonstrate Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer,” Haas said in a statement after the verdict.
Earlier this month, a Los Angeles jury awarded $40 million to two women who claimed Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer. And in October, another California jury ordered the company to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died of mesothelioma, claiming she developed the cancer because the baby powder she used was contaminated with asbestos.
LATEST POSTS
- 1
New movies to watch this weekend: See 'The Running Man' in theaters, rent 'One Battle After Another,' stream 'Nobody 2' on Peacock - 2
Audits of the Top Science fiction Movies This Year - 3
Pfizer in $41.5 million settlement with Texas over ADHD drug for children - 4
Climate engineering would alter the oceans, reshaping marine life – our new study examines each method’s risks - 5
The 15 Most Motivating TED Discusses All Time
Exploring the Mind boggling Universe of Connections: Individual Bits of knowledge
Iran executes two men who tried storming military facility during January protest crackdown
The best overlooked performances of 2025
People with depression can treat themselves at home with new device
Why Tourists May Want To Reconsider Traveling To This Popular Spot In Italy In 2026
Dominating the Art of Composing: Creator Bits of knowledge
SUVs Known for Their Looks As opposed to Their Capacity
The Ascent of the Kona SUV: How Hyundai's Reduced Hybrid Is Vanquishing the Streets
UN rights chief: Israel's new Gaza aid agency rules 'outrageous'













